void-packages/srcpkgs/glibc/patches/glibc-upstream-08.patch

77 lines
2.7 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

From 2aa1a7a8f8b9b7879bc6eb1c34d1580f992c406d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:48:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 08] assert: Suppress pedantic warning caused by statement
expression [BZ #21242]
(cherry picked from commit 8b2c63e4e2ad1fd161f80004ed30624f2a37b57b)
---
ChangeLog | 7 +++++++
NEWS | 1 +
assert/assert.h | 12 +++++++++---
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 5ea9b8baa7..0057c0902a 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2017-08-11 Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
+
+ [BZ #21242]
+ * assert/assert.h [__GNUC__ && !__STRICT_ANSI__] (assert):
+ Suppress pedantic warning resulting from statement expression.
+ (__ASSERT_FUNCTION): Add missing __extension__.
+
2017-08-10 Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
* malloc/malloc.c (get_max_fast): Reimplement as an inline
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index ec6cf34122..d57c4052cf 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Version 2.26.1
The following bugs are resolved with this release:
+ [21242] assert: Suppress pedantic warning caused by statement expression
[21885] getaddrinfo: Release resolver context on error in gethosts
[21932] Unpaired __resolv_context_get in generic get*_r implementation
diff --git a/assert/assert.h b/assert/assert.h
index 22f019537c..6801cfeb10 100644
--- a/assert/assert.h
+++ b/assert/assert.h
@@ -91,13 +91,19 @@ __END_DECLS
? __ASSERT_VOID_CAST (0) \
: __assert_fail (#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__, __ASSERT_FUNCTION))
# else
+/* The first occurrence of EXPR is not evaluated due to the sizeof,
+ but will trigger any pedantic warnings masked by the __extension__
+ for the second occurrence. The explicit comparison against zero is
+ required to support function pointers and bit fields in this
+ context, and to suppress the evaluation of variable length
+ arrays. */
# define assert(expr) \
- ({ \
+ ((void) sizeof ((expr) == 0), __extension__ ({ \
if (expr) \
; /* empty */ \
else \
__assert_fail (#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__, __ASSERT_FUNCTION); \
- })
+ }))
# endif
# ifdef __USE_GNU
@@ -113,7 +119,7 @@ __END_DECLS
C9x has a similar variable called __func__, but prefer the GCC one since
it demangles C++ function names. */
# if defined __cplusplus ? __GNUC_PREREQ (2, 6) : __GNUC_PREREQ (2, 4)
-# define __ASSERT_FUNCTION __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
+# define __ASSERT_FUNCTION __extension__ __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
# else
# if defined __STDC_VERSION__ && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L
# define __ASSERT_FUNCTION __func__