diff --git a/srcpkgs/kernel-xen-dom0/patches/asus_atk0110_missing_MBIF_method_not_fatal.diff b/srcpkgs/kernel-xen-dom0/patches/asus_atk0110_missing_MBIF_method_not_fatal.diff deleted file mode 120000 index 2f95e256d3c..00000000000 --- a/srcpkgs/kernel-xen-dom0/patches/asus_atk0110_missing_MBIF_method_not_fatal.diff +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -../../kernel/patches/asus_atk0110_missing_MBIF_method_not_fatal.diff \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/srcpkgs/kernel-xen-dom0/patches/asus_atk0110_missing_MBIF_method_not_fatal.diff b/srcpkgs/kernel-xen-dom0/patches/asus_atk0110_missing_MBIF_method_not_fatal.diff new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..efc107c02ea --- /dev/null +++ b/srcpkgs/kernel-xen-dom0/patches/asus_atk0110_missing_MBIF_method_not_fatal.diff @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +Patch submitted to lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, here: + +http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-January/027606.html + +--- drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c.orig 2010-01-07 00:07:45.000000000 +0100 ++++ drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c 2010-01-12 19:38:48.066204943 +0100 +@@ -1141,12 +1141,7 @@ static int atk_add(struct acpi_device *d + buf.length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER; + ret = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(data->atk_handle, BOARD_ID, NULL, + &buf, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE); +- if (ret != AE_OK) { +- dev_dbg(&device->dev, "atk: method MBIF not found\n"); +- err = -ENODEV; +- goto out; +- } +- ++ if (ret == AE_OK) { + obj = buf.pointer; + if (obj->package.count >= 2 && + obj->package.elements[1].type == ACPI_TYPE_STRING) { +@@ -1154,6 +1149,15 @@ static int atk_add(struct acpi_device *d + obj->package.elements[1].string.pointer); + } + ACPI_FREE(buf.pointer); ++ } else { ++ /* ++ * Some DSDTs do not have the MBIF method, but this should ++ * not be treated as fatal error! just mention this fact ++ * and continue. ++ */ ++ dev_dbg(&device->dev, ++ "atk: method MBIF not found, continuing...\n"); ++ } + + /* Check for hwmon methods: first check "old" style methods; note that + * both may be present: in this case we stick to the old interface;