2010-11-20 18:54:45 +01:00
|
|
|
# Template file for 'gst-plugins-bad'.
|
|
|
|
|
pkgname=gst-plugins-bad
|
2012-02-22 21:27:24 +01:00
|
|
|
version=0.10.23
|
2012-06-06 12:48:01 +02:00
|
|
|
revision=2
|
2011-10-24 14:14:47 +02:00
|
|
|
build_style=gnu-configure
|
2011-10-03 14:04:50 +02:00
|
|
|
configure_args="--enable-experimental --disable-static"
|
2012-05-23 18:26:56 +02:00
|
|
|
# Requires libgstfft-0.10.so.0 from gst-plugins-base-0.10.36.
|
|
|
|
|
subpackages="$pkgname-devel"
|
|
|
|
|
depends="gst-plugins-base>=0.10.36"
|
2012-06-06 12:48:01 +02:00
|
|
|
makedepends="pkg-config intltool alsa-lib-devel celt-devel openssl-devel gst-plugins-base-devel libdca-devel orc-devel libmms-devel exempi-devel libexif-devel libmpcdec-devel faac-devel SDL-devel libpng-devel>=1.5.10 faad2-devel libdvdread-devel libdvdnav-devel librsvg-devel libsndfile-devel xvidcore-devel jasper-devel libmodplug-devel neon-devel libcurl-devel libvpx-devel libvdpau-devel libgsm-devel"
|
2010-11-20 18:54:45 +01:00
|
|
|
short_desc="GStreamer plugins from the bad set"
|
2011-10-03 14:04:50 +02:00
|
|
|
maintainer="Juan RP <xtraeme@gmail.com>"
|
|
|
|
|
license="GPL-2, LGPL-2.1"
|
2012-06-06 12:48:01 +02:00
|
|
|
homepage="http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org"
|
|
|
|
|
distfiles="$homepage/src/$pkgname/$pkgname-$version.tar.xz"
|
2012-02-22 21:27:24 +01:00
|
|
|
checksum=03cf0786391c64625569072e904082a08861f05a63d64b2f8e8dad3f26d81bf9
|
2010-11-20 18:54:45 +01:00
|
|
|
long_desc="
|
|
|
|
|
GStreamer is a streaming media framework, badd on graphs of filters which
|
|
|
|
|
operate on media data. Applications using this library can do anything
|
|
|
|
|
real-time sound processing to playing videos, and just about anything
|
|
|
|
|
else media-related. Its plugin-badd architecture means that new data
|
|
|
|
|
types or processing capabilities can be added simply by installing new
|
|
|
|
|
plug-ins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-14 01:21:02 +02:00
|
|
|
GStreamer Bad Plug-ins is a set of plug-ins that are not up to par
|
2010-11-20 18:54:45 +01:00
|
|
|
compared to the rest. They might be close to being good quality, but
|
|
|
|
|
they're missing something - be it a good code review, some documentation,
|
|
|
|
|
a set of tests, a real live maintainer, or some actual wide use."
|
